Rubio Cracks Down: Visas Revoked for “Anti-American” Foreign Nationals

In a sweeping move that’s drawing both praise and outrage, Secretary of State Marco Rubio announced an aggressive campaign to revoke and deny U.S. visas for individuals he says “hate America” or pose a threat to national values.

“Visas are a privilege, not a right,” Rubio said during a press briefing earlier this week. “If you're here to protest against America, disrupt our universities, or support terrorist organizations, you’re going home.”

The policy shift has already led to the cancellation of over 300 student visas, targeting foreign nationals who participated in recent campus protests, many of which erupted in the wake of renewed Middle East tensions. Rubio labeled some protesters as “radical agitators” and emphasized that the U.S. would not tolerate ideological hostility from guests on American soil.

Targeting Supporters of Terrorism

Rubio also invoked provisions of the Immigration and Nationality Act that allow the U.S. government to deny entry or revoke visas for individuals who “endorse or espouse terrorist activity.” He made clear that even verbal or online support for designated terrorist organizations could disqualify a visa applicant.

“Anyone who sympathizes with those who attack American values or allies has no place here,” he said.

Broader Sanctions and Foreign Censorship

The visa crackdown extends beyond student activism. Rubio has authorized bans against foreign officials accused of suppressing free speech—particularly those who, in his words, “censor Americans online.” In another notable move, he revoked all active U.S. visas held by South Sudanese nationals in response to the country’s refusal to cooperate with U.S. security policies.

Additionally, students from China affiliated with the Chinese Communist Party or linked to sensitive research programs may face heightened scrutiny or bans under the new directive.

Controversy and Constitutional Questions

Critics have blasted the measures as xenophobic and authoritarian, raising concerns over freedom of expression and due process. Civil rights advocates argue that protesting U.S. policy or supporting controversial causes should not be equated with hating America.

“This is a dangerous precedent,” said Maya Hassan, legal director at the International Rights Watch. “Dissent is not disloyalty.”

Rubio dismissed those concerns. “You don’t get to come here and trash this country on our dime,” he said. “If you want to chant 'Death to America,' go do it elsewhere.”

What’s Next?

The State Department says it is reviewing visa records of thousands of foreign nationals and has launched a new vetting system that includes scrutiny of social media posts and ideological affiliations. A growing number of visa applications are expected to be denied under the new guidelines.

While supporters hail the move as a strong defense of national sovereignty, opponents warn of potential diplomatic fallout and damage to America’s reputation as a beacon of free expression.